Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction: Can Massachusetts Cover Against Stonehill?

Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction, September 19, 2026

Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction: Can Massachusetts Cover Against Stonehill?

Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction: Get CFB picks, odds analysis, best bet, matchup trends, total prediction, and projected score.

The best bet in the Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction is Massachusetts -20.5 or better, with the Minutemen projected to win comfortably at home. UMass enters this matchup 2-0 after defeating Rutgers 37-21 and Sacred Heart 37-10, while Stonehill is 1-2 following a 42-35 loss at New Hampshire.

Our secondary selection is Over 54.5, with a projected score of Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20. UMass has already scored 74 points through two games, while Stonehill has shown significant offensive potential, producing 491 total yards and 35 points against New Hampshire.

Summary

  • Best Bet: Massachusetts -20.5 or better
  • Secondary Bet: Over 54.5
  • Projected Score: Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20
  • Predicted Winner: Massachusetts
  • Game: Stonehill Skyhawks at Massachusetts Minutemen
  • Date: Saturday, September 19, 2026
  • Kickoff: 3:30 p.m. ET
  • Venue: McGuirk Alumni Stadium, Amherst, Massachusetts
  • Stonehill Record: 1-2
  • Massachusetts Record: 2-0
  • Series: First meeting

Massachusetts enters the matchup undefeated after opening the season with a 37-21 road victory over Rutgers before returning home to beat Sacred Heart 37-10. Stonehill has already played three games, beating New Haven 21-3 but losing to Bryant 24-6 and New Hampshire 42-35.

The matchup represents Stonehill’s first-ever game against an FBS opponent. The Skyhawks’ 2026 schedule specifically includes back-to-back FBS road games against Massachusetts and Ohio.

That difference in experience is one of the biggest factors behind our prediction.

Table of Contents

  • Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction
  • Game Information
  • Stonehill Betting Outlook
  • Massachusetts Betting Outlook
  • Stonehill Offense vs. Massachusetts Defense
  • Massachusetts Offense vs. Stonehill Defense
  • Quarterback Matchup
  • Rushing Attack
  • Passing Game
  • Defensive Matchup
  • Special Teams
  • Home-Field Advantage
  • College Football Odds Analysis
  • Stonehill at Massachusetts Best Bet
  • Stonehill at Massachusetts Over/Under Prediction
  • Projected Score
  • Key Betting Factors
  • Follow-Up Questions
  • FAQ
  • Final Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction

Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction

The biggest reason to favor Massachusetts is the difference in competition and roster depth.

Stonehill is an FCS program competing in the Northeast Conference. Massachusetts is an FBS program competing in the Mid-American Conference. The Skyhawks have played well enough to remain competitive against FCS opponents, but this is their first game against an FBS team.

That distinction matters.

Stonehill has already shown that its offense can produce explosive numbers. Against New Hampshire, the Skyhawks gained 491 yards and scored 35 points despite losing 42-35. Quarterback Jack O’Connell threw for 357 yards and four touchdowns while adding 53 rushing yards.

So this is not a matchup where Massachusetts can simply assume Stonehill will struggle to move the football.

The bigger question is whether the Skyhawks can consistently stop UMass.

That is where the matchup becomes much more favorable for the Minutemen.

Massachusetts has scored exactly 37 points in each of its first two games. The Minutemen opened with a 37-21 win at Rutgers and then dominated Sacred Heart 37-10 at home.

The offense has been efficient, while the defense has produced timely turnovers.

Massachusetts also has the benefit of playing its third straight game in the Northeast and its second consecutive game at McGuirk Alumni Stadium.

For Stonehill, this is a difficult spot.

The Skyhawks are coming off a road game at New Hampshire and now have to face another road opponent, this time against an FBS program.

That combination of travel, opponent quality and roster depth makes Massachusetts the clear side.

Game Information

Stonehill visits Massachusetts on Saturday, September 19, 2026.

Kickoff is scheduled for 3:30 p.m. ET at McGuirk Alumni Stadium in Amherst, Massachusetts. The matchup is listed on both schools’ official schedules.

This will be the first football meeting between the programs.

Massachusetts is 2-0 entering the game, while Stonehill is 1-2.

The Minutemen have already faced an FBS opponent this season, beating Rutgers 37-21 on the road. They then handled Sacred Heart 37-10 in their home opener.

Stonehill’s schedule has been more unusual.

The Skyhawks opened against Bryant, defeated New Haven on the road, and then traveled to New Hampshire. After the Massachusetts game, Stonehill immediately travels to Ohio for another FBS matchup.

That means this game begins a difficult stretch for the Skyhawks.

Massachusetts, meanwhile, has an opportunity to start 3-0 for the first time in several years.

The Minutemen’s official recap noted that the program reached 2-0 for the first time in its FBS era following the Sacred Heart victory.

Stonehill Betting Outlook

Stonehill enters the game with a 1-2 record, but the overall record does not fully describe the team’s offensive potential.

The Skyhawks have shown they can score.

Their latest game against New Hampshire is the clearest example.

Stonehill scored 35 points and produced 491 yards of total offense. O’Connell completed an outstanding performance with 357 passing yards and four touchdowns while also rushing for 53 yards.

That performance is important for college football bettors.

Stonehill is not entering this matchup with an offense that has been completely ineffective.

The Skyhawks have demonstrated the ability to create explosive passing plays and sustain drives.

O’Connell has also reached 3,306 career passing yards and 29 career touchdown passes, according to Stonehill’s official recap.

Jaylin Baker provides another weapon.

Against New Hampshire, Baker caught six passes for 64 yards and two touchdowns. Shane Eason also contributed as a runner and receiver, while Cole Clark recorded four catches for 88 yards.

That gives Stonehill enough skill-position talent to challenge Massachusetts.

However, the Skyhawks need to avoid falling behind early.

If Massachusetts establishes a two-score lead, Stonehill will likely be forced into a pass-heavy game script.

That could create opportunities for the UMass defense.

The Skyhawks also need to improve defensively.

Giving up 42 points to New Hampshire makes it difficult to trust Stonehill against an undefeated FBS opponent that has already scored 37 points twice.

Massachusetts Betting Outlook

Massachusetts is one of the more intriguing teams in this matchup because of its fast start.

The Minutemen entered 2026 with plenty to prove after struggling in recent seasons.

They responded by defeating Rutgers 37-21 on the road.

That victory was significant because Rutgers entered the game as a Big Ten opponent, giving Massachusetts an immediate test against FBS competition.

The Minutemen then returned home and beat Sacred Heart 37-10.

That victory made UMass 2-0 and gave the program back-to-back wins. The official team recap noted that Massachusetts had started 2-0 for the first time in its FBS era.

The offense has been especially productive.

UMass has scored 74 points through two games.

William “Pop” Watson III has been an important part of that success.

Against Sacred Heart, Watson completed 9 of 10 passes for 152 yards while adding 40 rushing yards and a touchdown.

He does not need to throw 40 times per game.

That is actually one of the strengths of this UMass offense.

The Minutemen can attack through the air while also using their quarterback in the rushing game.

Elijah Faulkner led Massachusetts with 72 rushing yards against Sacred Heart, while the team also received significant contributions from its skill-position group.

UMass also has a dangerous special-teams weapon in T.Y. Harding.

Harding opened the Sacred Heart game with a 49-yard touchdown reception and then added an 82-yard punt-return touchdown only a few minutes later.

Those types of explosive plays can completely change a point-spread bet.

If Massachusetts produces one or two early explosive touchdowns, the Minutemen could be in position to cover before halftime.

Stonehill Offense vs. Massachusetts Defense

Stonehill’s offense has a chance to score points, but the matchup becomes more difficult than the raw statistics suggest.

O’Connell is playing well.

His 357-yard, four-touchdown performance against New Hampshire is exactly the type of game that gives Stonehill hope as a large underdog.

But Massachusetts has already shown it can create turnovers.

The Minutemen intercepted Rutgers quarterback three times in their season-opening victory, and Jahmad Harmon added another interception against Sacred Heart, returning it 34 yards for a touchdown.

Harmon has now produced three interceptions through two games.

That creates a significant concern for Stonehill.

The Skyhawks cannot afford to give Massachusetts short fields.

If Stonehill turns the ball over deep in its own territory, UMass could quickly turn a competitive game into a multi-score lead.

Stonehill should emphasize the running game early.

The objective should be to keep the UMass defense honest and reduce the number of obvious passing situations.

O’Connell can then use play-action and intermediate routes to attack the Minutemen.

The Skyhawks have enough offensive talent to score 17 to 21 points.

The question is whether they can avoid turnovers and sustain enough drives to reach that range.

Massachusetts Offense vs. Stonehill Defense

This is where Massachusetts has its clearest advantage.

UMass has scored 37 points in each of its first two games.

The Minutemen have also shown that they can score in multiple ways.

Against Sacred Heart, Harding produced a receiving touchdown and a punt-return touchdown.

Watson added a rushing touchdown.

Harmon returned an interception for another score.

That means Massachusetts does not need one specific offensive player to carry the game.

The Minutemen can score through the passing game, rushing attack, defense and special teams.

That versatility is difficult for an FCS opponent to handle.

Stonehill’s defense will need to prevent explosive plays.

That is easier said than done.

Massachusetts already demonstrated against Rutgers that it can hit big plays against FBS competition.

If the Minutemen consistently gain five or six yards on early downs, the Skyhawks will eventually be forced to bring additional defenders into the box.

That should create opportunities for Watson to attack downfield.

Quarterback Matchup

The quarterback matchup is one of the most interesting aspects of this game.

Stonehill’s Jack O’Connell has already demonstrated significant production.

His performance against New Hampshire was arguably the strongest individual offensive performance of his season so far.

He threw for 357 yards and four touchdowns while adding 53 rushing yards.

That means UMass cannot simply focus on the running game.

The Minutemen will have to respect O’Connell’s mobility and passing ability.

Massachusetts counters with Watson.

Watson was extremely efficient against Sacred Heart, completing 9 of 10 passes for 152 yards and adding 40 rushing yards and a touchdown.

The bigger advantage for Watson is the environment around him.

Massachusetts has already proven it can win with him without requiring massive passing numbers.

That reduces the pressure on the quarterback.

If UMass runs effectively, Watson can pick his spots.

That is a favorable setup against Stonehill.

The Skyhawks need O’Connell to match that efficiency while avoiding turnovers.

If Massachusetts wins the turnover battle by two or more, the point spread could become irrelevant by the fourth quarter.

Rushing Attack

The rushing attack should be a major focus for Massachusetts.

The Minutemen have already demonstrated the ability to use Watson as a runner while getting production from their running backs.

Against Sacred Heart, Elijah Faulkner led the team with 72 rushing yards. Watson added 40 yards himself.

That gives UMass multiple ways to attack the box.

Stonehill must decide whether to use extra defenders to stop the run or maintain enough coverage to limit the passing game.

Neither choice is ideal.

If Stonehill crowds the line, Watson can use play-action.

If the Skyhawks stay in lighter defensive personnel, Massachusetts can run the football.

That matchup should favor UMass over four quarters.

Stonehill also needs its own rushing attack to keep the game manageable.

Long drives can limit Massachusetts possessions.

The fewer possessions UMass gets, the better chance Stonehill has of staying within a large point spread.

However, if the Skyhawks repeatedly go three-and-out, the Minutemen could accumulate possessions and create a runaway score.

Passing Game

Both teams have quarterbacks capable of making plays through the air.

That makes the passing game one of the reasons we prefer the Over as a secondary selection.

O’Connell threw four touchdown passes against New Hampshire.

He has already shown that he can create explosive plays even when Stonehill is not favored.

Massachusetts has an even deeper collection of offensive weapons.

Harding’s 49-yard touchdown reception against Sacred Heart was immediately followed by an 82-yard punt-return touchdown.

Watson has also shown strong efficiency.

The Minutemen do not need to throw constantly to produce points.

That balance is important.

Against an FCS opponent, UMass should be able to use short passes, designed quarterback runs and play-action to move the chains.

If Stonehill’s secondary struggles, Massachusetts could generate several explosive gains.

That would increase the chances of the Over hitting.

Defensive Matchup

The defensive matchup favors Massachusetts.

The Minutemen have allowed 31 points against Rutgers and only 10 against Sacred Heart.

More importantly, they have already produced multiple takeaways.

Harmon has three interceptions through two games, including a pick-six against Sacred Heart.

That creates a major problem for Stonehill.

The Skyhawks are capable of moving the ball.

But moving the ball is not enough if drives end with turnovers.

O’Connell will have to be particularly careful when throwing into coverage.

Massachusetts should attempt to force Stonehill into obvious passing situations.

If UMass gets an early lead, the Minutemen can increase pressure and make Stonehill one-dimensional.

That is when the game could separate.

Stonehill’s defense, meanwhile, has to find a way to slow a UMass offense that has scored 37 points in consecutive games.

The Skyhawks cannot allow Massachusetts to consistently win first down.

If UMass stays ahead of the chains, the Minutemen should have little trouble creating scoring opportunities.

Special Teams

Special teams could be a major difference-maker.

Massachusetts already scored a special-teams touchdown against Sacred Heart when T.Y. Harding returned a punt 82 yards for a touchdown.

That gives Stonehill another phase to worry about.

The Skyhawks cannot simply focus on Watson and the running game.

They need strong punt coverage and kickoff coverage.

Field position could become extremely important if Stonehill is trying to stay within a large spread.

Starting drives inside its own 20-yard line would make life difficult for the Skyhawks.

Conversely, strong returns could give Stonehill short fields and create scoring opportunities.

For bettors considering the Over, special teams are another reason the total could climb quickly.

One return touchdown can completely change the game script.

Home-Field Advantage

Massachusetts has a clear home-field advantage.

The Minutemen opened their home schedule with a 37-10 victory over Sacred Heart at McGuirk Alumni Stadium.

The official box score listed attendance at 14,895 for that game.

Now UMass returns to the same stadium against Stonehill.

That continuity should help.

Stonehill is coming off a road game at New Hampshire.

The Skyhawks then have to travel again to face an FBS opponent.

The schedule is especially demanding because Stonehill has Ohio waiting the following week, meaning the Skyhawks are playing back-to-back FBS road games.

Massachusetts does not have that same travel burden.

The Minutemen should be fresher and more comfortable with the surroundings.

That advantage becomes more important if the game remains close into the second half.

College Football Odds Analysis

There is an important caveat for bettors.

At the time of research, the major odds pages checked were not showing a consistent traditional spread, total or moneyline for Stonehill at Massachusetts. Action Network listed the matchup but showed the spread and total as unavailable.

Therefore, Massachusetts -20.5 is being treated as a working number for this prediction rather than a confirmed market consensus.

The same applies to our working total of 54.5.

The underlying matchup still provides a clear betting direction.

ESPN’s matchup predictor gives Massachusetts a 96.4% chance to win, compared with 3.6% for Stonehill.

That is consistent with the broader handicap.

Massachusetts has already defeated an FBS opponent.

Stonehill has not yet played an FBS team.

The Skyhawks are also coming off a 42-35 loss to New Hampshire.

UMass, meanwhile, has scored 37 points in consecutive games.

The biggest question is how high the spread should be.

A number in the low 20s gives Massachusetts a reasonable path to covering.

A number approaching 30 would require more caution because Stonehill’s offense has shown enough explosiveness to score against better opponents.

For that reason, UMass -20.5 or better is our preferred range.

Stonehill at Massachusetts Best Bet

Our best bet is Massachusetts -20.5 or better.

The Minutemen have too many advantages.

They have the better overall roster, FBS experience, home-field advantage, defensive playmakers and a quarterback who has already shown he can operate efficiently.

UMass also has explosive special-teams ability.

Harding scored twice against Sacred Heart, including an 82-yard punt return, while Harmon produced a defensive touchdown on an interception.

Those plays demonstrate how quickly Massachusetts can build a lead.

Stonehill’s best argument is its offense.

O’Connell is playing extremely well.

The Skyhawks gained 491 yards against New Hampshire and scored 35 points.

That makes Stonehill dangerous as a large underdog.

But it also makes the Over attractive.

If Stonehill scores 17 to 21 points, Massachusetts needs only 34 to 38 points for the Over to become highly competitive.

UMass has already scored 37 in each of its first two games.

That is why our projected score reaches the low 60s.

Stonehill at Massachusetts Over/Under Prediction

Our secondary selection is Over 54.5.

The biggest reason is the offensive matchup.

Stonehill has already shown that it can score against FCS competition and produce explosive passing plays.

O’Connell threw for four touchdowns against New Hampshire.

Massachusetts has scored 74 points through two games.

The Minutemen have also produced touchdowns through offense, defense and special teams.

That gives this game several possible paths to a high total.

One possible scenario is Massachusetts controlling the game and scoring around 40 points.

Stonehill could then contribute 17 or 20 points.

Another possibility is Stonehill falling behind early and throwing more frequently.

That would create additional possessions and potentially increase the scoring pace.

The biggest threat to the Over would be Massachusetts building a huge lead and slowing the game down in the second half.

That is why the Over remains the secondary selection rather than the primary bet.

Projected Score

Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20

Our projected score is Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20.

That produces 61 total points.

The projection reflects Massachusetts’ offensive consistency and Stonehill’s ability to generate yards through the passing game.

We expect Stonehill to have some success early.

O’Connell is coming off a 357-yard, four-touchdown performance, so it would be overly aggressive to project a complete offensive shutdown.

However, Massachusetts should eventually control the line of scrimmage.

The Minutemen can use Watson’s mobility, the running game and play-action passing to sustain drives.

If Massachusetts creates another early turnover, the game could become one-sided quickly.

A 24-10 halftime score would put UMass in a strong position to cover.

Stonehill would then have to throw more often.

That could produce additional points for both teams.

Key Betting Factors

1. UMass Is 2-0

Massachusetts has started the season with wins over Rutgers and Sacred Heart.

2. Stonehill Is 1-2

The Skyhawks have one win and two losses, including a 42-35 defeat at New Hampshire.

3. Jack O’Connell Is Playing Well

O’Connell threw for 357 yards and four touchdowns against New Hampshire.

4. Massachusetts Has Explosive Playmakers

T.Y. Harding produced a 49-yard touchdown catch and an 82-yard punt-return touchdown against Sacred Heart.

5. UMass Is Creating Turnovers

Jahmad Harmon has three interceptions through two games and returned one for a touchdown against Sacred Heart.

6. Stonehill Has Never Played an FBS Team

The Massachusetts game is the first FBS matchup in Stonehill football history.

7. Home Field Favors Massachusetts

The Minutemen are playing at McGuirk Alumni Stadium for the second consecutive week.

8. Stonehill Has Another FBS Game Next Week

The Skyhawks travel to Ohio immediately after Massachusetts.

9. Both Offenses Can Produce

UMass has scored 37 points twice, while Stonehill just scored 35 against New Hampshire.

10. Turnovers Could Decide the Spread

If Massachusetts creates short fields, the Minutemen could cover the spread much more comfortably.

Follow-Up Questions

Is Massachusetts favored against Stonehill?

Yes. Massachusetts is the clear favorite according to the available matchup projections. ESPN’s model gives UMass a 96.4% win probability.

Can Stonehill cover against Massachusetts?

Stonehill has enough offensive ability to make a large spread dangerous, especially after scoring 35 points against New Hampshire. However, Massachusetts -20.5 or better is our preferred side.

What is the best Stonehill vs. Massachusetts bet?

The best bet is Massachusetts -20.5 or better.

Should you bet the Over or Under?

The secondary selection is Over 54.5.

Who has the better quarterback?

Massachusetts has the overall matchup advantage, although Stonehill quarterback Jack O’Connell has been highly productive and threw four touchdown passes against New Hampshire.

Can Stonehill score against Massachusetts?

Yes. Stonehill has demonstrated strong offensive production, and O’Connell is capable of creating explosive passing plays.

Where is Stonehill vs. Massachusetts being played?

The game is being played at McGuirk Alumni Stadium in Amherst, Massachusetts.

When is Stonehill vs. Massachusetts?

The game is scheduled for Saturday, September 19, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. ET.

Has Stonehill ever played Massachusetts?

No. This is the first football meeting between the programs.

What is the projected score?

Our projected score is Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20.

FAQ

1. Who is favored in the Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction?

Massachusetts is the heavy favorite. ESPN’s matchup predictor gives the Minutemen a 96.4% chance of winning.

2. What is the best bet for Stonehill at Massachusetts?

The best bet is Massachusetts -20.5 or better. The Minutemen have the advantage in roster depth, FBS experience, defense and home field.

3. Can Stonehill beat Massachusetts outright?

Stonehill would need a major upset. The Skyhawks have offensive talent, but Massachusetts has already defeated an FBS opponent and enters the matchup undefeated.

4. What is the Stonehill at Massachusetts point spread?

A consistent traditional market spread was not available at the time of research. For this prediction, Massachusetts -20.5 is used as a working number.

5. What is the Stonehill at Massachusetts over/under?

A consistent traditional total was also unavailable at the time of research. Our working total is 54.5 points, with an Over lean.

6. How many points will Massachusetts score?

We project Massachusetts to score 41 points.

7. How many points will Stonehill score?

We project Stonehill to score 20 points.

8. Who is Massachusetts’ key offensive player?

William “Pop” Watson III is the key offensive player. He completed 9 of 10 passes for 152 yards and added 40 rushing yards and a touchdown against Sacred Heart.

9. Who is Stonehill’s key offensive player?

Jack O’Connell is the key player for Stonehill. He threw for 357 yards and four touchdowns against New Hampshire while adding 53 rushing yards.

10. What is the final Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction?

The final pick is Massachusetts -20.5 or better, with Over 54.5 as the secondary selection. The projected score is Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20.

Final Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction

The Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction favors the Minutemen because of the significant difference in FBS experience, roster depth, defensive playmaking and home-field advantage.

Stonehill deserves respect.

The Skyhawks have already shown that their offense can produce against quality FCS competition. Their latest performance was particularly impressive, with 491 total yards and 35 points against New Hampshire. Jack O’Connell threw for 357 yards and four touchdowns while adding 53 rushing yards.

That offensive production gives Stonehill a legitimate path to scoring against Massachusetts.

However, UMass has already faced a much higher level of competition.

The Minutemen opened the season by beating Rutgers 37-21 and then defeated Sacred Heart 37-10.

UMass has now scored 37 points in consecutive games.

The Minutemen also have playmakers who can change the game without needing long offensive drives.

T.Y. Harding scored on a 49-yard reception and an 82-yard punt return against Sacred Heart, while Jahmad Harmon returned an interception 34 yards for a touchdown.

That explosive ability is a major concern for Stonehill.

The Skyhawks need to avoid turnovers and keep the game within one or two possessions into the second half.

If Massachusetts gets an early lead, Stonehill’s passing game could create opportunities for the Over but also expose the Skyhawks to additional turnovers.

The schedule also favors UMass.

Massachusetts is playing at home, while Stonehill is coming off a road game at New Hampshire and then faces another FBS opponent at Ohio the following week.

ESPN’s matchup model reflects the overall difference, giving Massachusetts a 96.4% win probability.

The primary concern for the spread is Stonehill’s offensive production.

A team capable of scoring 35 points can make a large number uncomfortable.

That is why we prefer Massachusetts at -20.5 or better rather than laying an extreme number.

The Over also has appeal because both teams have demonstrated scoring ability.

If Massachusetts reaches the low 40s and Stonehill contributes around 20 points, the total should clear the working number.

Best Bet: Massachusetts -20.5 or better

Secondary Bet: Over 54.5

Projected Score: Massachusetts 41, Stonehill 20

The final Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction is Massachusetts to win comfortably and cover a reasonable spread. The Minutemen should control the line of scrimmage, create more explosive plays and use their defensive and special-teams advantages to pull away.

If the spread moves substantially above the mid-20s, the value on Massachusetts becomes less attractive. At -20.5 or better, however, the Minutemen are the preferred side.

reduced juice MLB

Today’s College Betting Picks, September 2026

Miami at Wake Forest Betting Prediction and Pick, September 18, 2026
Houston at Texas Tech Betting Prediction and Pick, September 18, 2026
Portland State at Oregon Betting Prediction and Pick, September 18, 2026
Coastal Carolina at Delaware Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Mercer at Georgia Tech Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Kansas at Arizona State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Akron at Minnesota Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Bowling Green at Iowa State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
North Carolina at Clemson Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Buffalo at Penn State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Tulane at Kansas State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Georgia at Arkansas Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
North Texas at Texas State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Kent State at Ohio State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Eastern Michigan at Wisconsin Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
North Carolina State at Vanderbilt Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Wyoming at Central Michigan Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Southern Illinois at Illinois Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Maine at Boston College Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Temple at Toledo Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Duquesne at Washington State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
UTEP at Michigan Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
USC at Rutgers Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Utah State at Utah Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Miami (OH) at Cincinnati Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Stonehill at Massachusetts Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
SMU at Louisville Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Kentucky at Texas A&M Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Florida State at Alabama Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Wagner at California Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Louisiana Tech at Baylor Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Western Kentucky at Indiana Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Stanford at Duke Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Ball State at Liberty Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Northern Iowa at Iowa Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Mississippi State at South Carolina Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Southeastern Louisiana at Louisiana-Monroe Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Charlotte at Appalachian State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Florida International at Florida Atlantic Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
East Carolina at Old Dominion Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Marshall at Missouri State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
UT Martin at Memphis Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Western Michigan at Rice Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Murray State at Oklahoma State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Troy at Missouri Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Georgia State at UCF Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Ohio at South Alabama Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Georgia Southern at Jacksonville State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Florida at Auburn Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Nevada at Middle Tennessee Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Nicholls at Sam Houston Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Connecticut at Southern Miss Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Delaware State at South Florida Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
North Dakota at Nebraska Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Eastern Washington at Washington Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Colorado at Northwestern Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Michigan State at Notre Dame Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
New Mexico at Oklahoma Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Virginia Tech at Maryland Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
LSU at Ole Miss Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Virginia at West Virginia Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
BYU at Colorado State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Kennesaw State at Tennessee Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
East Texas A&M at Tulsa Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
UAB at Louisiana-Lafayette Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
UTSA at Texas Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Arkansas State at TCU Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
South Dakota at Boise State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
James Madison at San Diego State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
North Dakota State at Sacramento State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Northern Illinois at Arizona Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Purdue at UCLA Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Montana at Oregon State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026
Fresno State at San Jose State Betting Prediction and Pick, September 19, 2026

 All Sports Predictions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *