Best NFL Players of All Time: Adrian Peterson Biography. Ranking the Top Players in History. Place a bet on an NFL football game now.
Best NFL Players of All Time: Adrian Peterson Biography
Now in our Best NFL players of all time, we have the Adrian Peterson Biography.
Adrian Peterson might be the most renowned football player if he had played in a different period.
The best running back in the game is Peterson. He possesses an incredible blend of strength, speed, instinct, and desire. When Peterson is performing at his best, he devours yardage like a merciless machine.
But Peterson plays in a period where passing games are everything. In order to score points quickly, teams look for a quarterback who can read defenses and find many receivers with the ball. They want receivers who can leap over the defense to create plays, and they want big yardage after the catch. For many teams, the running game is practically a thing of the past.
They want to run the ball in the fourth quarter to keep the time ticking, and they want a running back who can convert first downs and touchdowns in circumstances involving little yards.
With the exception of the Minnesota Vikings, almost all teams seem to have moved past their reliance on the basic running approach. Though they still have a ways to go before they can boast the same kind of passing options as elite rivals like the Green Bay Packers and Chicago Bears, the Vikings undoubtedly desire such alternatives.
However, Peterson is with the Vikings, and he can dominate any game. Since his rookie season in 2007, when he averaged 5.6 yards per carry, ran for 1,341 yards, and scored 12 touchdowns on the ground, he has done that. After selecting Peterson seventh overall in the first round, the Vikings had no intention of gradually introducing him into the starting lineup.
It opened eyes throughout the NFL and showed Peterson what he could do against the top defensive players, as he was able to run over the strongest linebackers. “I was eager to join the NFL because I was looking for a challenge,” Peterson stated. “I was curious about my performance against the best players.” Despite my complete confidence in my abilities, I was determined to demonstrate them.
In a Week Eight matchup with the San Diego Chargers, he was at his best. With 296 rushing yards, including 253 in the second half, Peterson broke an NFL record. Peterson scored three touchdowns on the ground, the most important of which came halfway through the fourth quarter on a 46-yard scoring run that helped Minnesota win 35–17.
That season, Brad Childress, the Vikings’ coach, gained notoriety for wanting to give his team a chance through the passing game. But after he gained Peterson’s support, he modified his outlook.
Coach Brad Childress remarked, “I like to play football that way.” “I do respect those who can manage things, take someone’s will away from them, and use play-action to play off of that.” This serves as the ideal benchmark, if you’re searching. Even if Peterson’s first year was excellent, it was only the beginning. The best running back in the game discovered his best gear in his second season, which was simply amazing. Peterson gained 1,760 yards and 10 touchdowns on 363 rushes with the ball.
With over 23 carries per game on average that second season, Peterson was nothing more than a workhorse. Peterson tried to carry the 10-6 Vikings on his back and just wanted the ball every chance he got. In 2008, Minnesota qualified for the postseason but lost to the Philadelphia Eagles in the Wild-Card round.
The next season, Peterson was almost as good, rushing for 1,383 yards and an incredible eighteen touchdowns, making him the fantasy football owner’s darling. He had a 1,298-yard season in 2010 and 12 touchdowns that season to follow that one.
After rushing for 970 yards and 12 touchdowns in Week 16 against the Washington Redskins, Peterson suffered an ACL injury that ended his 2011 season. It seemed like he wouldn’t have a chance to be fit for the start of the 2012 season, thus the injury occurring so late in the season seemed to be a serious issue.
With his conditioning and training program, Peterson at least had a puncher’s chance of being ready for the upcoming season. He assured the Vikings and the media that he would be ready for the start of the season. Few people believed Peterson would be ready as the preseason progressed, but he was in the starting lineup for the first game against the Jacksonville Jaguars and ran for a very respectable 84 yards and two touchdowns.
Although he wasn’t at his best for that game, Peterson would reach his greatest form when he ran for 153 yards against the Arizona Cardinals in Week Seven.
That was the first of Peterson’s eight games in a row with 100 yards or more. In the first two weeks of December, he would rush for 210 yards against the Packers and 212 yards against the Rams. He gained an additional 199 yards in the regular-season matchup with Green Bay, bringing his total yardage for the season to 2,097.
Despite having one of the worst passing attacks in the league, the Vikings would also secure a postseason position that season. It didn’t matter because, despite recovering from a severe injury, Peterson simply carried his team on his shoulders.
Peterson won the Associated Press Offensive Player of the Year Award, the Bert Bell Award, and the NFL MVP Award for his outstanding play.
Few people believed that the season would be possible, even under the best of situations, especially given that it came so soon after a serious injury.
Peterson had the kind of season that made him feel like he could hang out with the greatest running backs in history. It was appropriate to include him among the likes of Emmitt Smith, Gale Sayers, Earl Campbell, and maybe even just below Jim Brown, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton.
With seven years of experience, Peterson is ready for the 2014 season. Running backs often begin to lose their effectiveness after six, seven, or eight years, according to the history book.
Should that be the case, Peterson might not be the same formidable opponent he once was. But he’s so strong, quick, agile, and talented that he might defy the odds and rank among the greatest running backs in game history.
Adrian Peterson Biography: Stats
Regular Season
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | Att | Yds | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | Y/G | A/G | Tgt |
2007 | 22 | MIN | RB | 28 | 14 | 9 | 238 | 1341 | 12 | 63 | 45 | 73 | 5.6 | 95.8 | 17 | 28 |
2008 | 23 | MIN | RB | 28 | 16 | 15 | 363 | 1760 | 10 | 82 | 45.5 | 67 | 4.8 | 110 | 22.7 | 39 |
2009 | 24 | MIN | RB | 28 | 16 | 15 | 314 | 1383 | 18 | 76 | 44.6 | 64 | 4.4 | 86.4 | 19.6 | 57 |
2010 | 25 | MIN | RB | 28 | 15 | 15 | 283 | 1298 | 12 | 71 | 45.6 | 80 | 4.6 | 86.5 | 18.9 | 50 |
2011 | 26 | MIN | RB | 28 | 12 | 12 | 208 | 970 | 12 | 48 | 45.7 | 54 | 4.7 | 80.8 | 17.3 | 24 |
2012 | 27 | MIN | RB | 28 | 16 | 16 | 348 | 2097 | 12 | 88 | 46.8 | 82 | 6 | 131.1 | 21.8 | 51 |
2013 | 28 | MIN | RB | 28 | 14 | 14 | 279 | 1266 | 10 | 61 | 43.7 | 78 | 4.5 | 90.4 | 19.9 | 40 |
2014 | 29 | MIN | RB | 28 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 75 | 0 | 4 | 42.9 | 17 | 3.6 | 75 | 21 | 3 |
2015 | 30 | MIN | RB | 28 | 16 | 16 | 327 | 1485 | 11 | 72 | 44.3 | 80 | 4.5 | 92.8 | 20.4 | 36 |
2016 | 31 | MIN | RB | 28 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 72 | 0 | 3 | 35.1 | 13 | 1.9 | 24 | 12.3 | 6 |
2017 | 32 | 2TM | RB | 10 | 7 | 156 | 529 | 2 | 39.1 | 27 | 3.4 | 52.9 | 15.6 | 19 | ||
ARI | RB | 23 | 6 | 6 | 129 | 448 | 2 | 16 | 38 | 27 | 3.5 | 74.7 | 21.5 | 16 | ||
NOR | RB | 28 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 81 | 0 | 5 | 44.4 | 11 | 3 | 20.3 | 6.8 | 3 | ||
2018 | 33 | WAS | RB | 26 | 16 | 16 | 251 | 1042 | 7 | 47 | 45.8 | 90 | 4.2 | 65.1 | 15.7 | 26 |
2019 | 34 | WAS | RB | 26 | 15 | 15 | 211 | 898 | 5 | 41 | 46 | 32 | 4.3 | 59.9 | 14.1 | 23 |
2020 | 35 | DET | RB | 28 | 16 | 10 | 156 | 604 | 7 | 34 | 44.2 | 38 | 3.9 | 37.8 | 9.8 | 18 |
2021 | 36 | 2TM | RB | 4 | 3 | 38 | 98 | 2 | 6 | 42.1 | 16 | 2.6 | 24.5 | 9.5 | 4 | |
TEN | RB | 8 | 3 | 2 | 27 | 82 | 1 | 4 | 44.4 | 16 | 3 | 27.3 | 9 | 4 | ||
SEA | RB | 21 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 36.4 | 7 | 1.5 | 16 | 11 |
More Regular Season Stats:
Year | Age | Tm | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | R/G | Y/G | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | Touch | Y/Tch | YScm | RRTD | Fmb | AV |
2007 | 22 | MIN | 19 | 268 | 14.1 | 1 | 14 | 57.1 | 60 | 1.4 | 19.1 | 67.90% | 9.6 | 257 | 6.3 | 1609 | 13 | 4 | 12 |
2008 | 23 | MIN | 21 | 125 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25.6 | 16 | 1.3 | 7.8 | 53.80% | 3.2 | 384 | 4.9 | 1885 | 10 | 9 | 13 |
2009 | 24 | MIN | 43 | 436 | 10.1 | 0 | 16 | 47.4 | 63 | 2.7 | 27.3 | 75.40% | 7.6 | 357 | 5.1 | 1819 | 18 | 7 | 16 |
2010 | 25 | MIN | 36 | 341 | 9.5 | 1 | 17 | 48 | 34 | 2.4 | 22.7 | 72.00% | 6.8 | 319 | 5.1 | 1639 | 13 | 1 | 11 |
2011 | 26 | MIN | 18 | 139 | 7.7 | 1 | 5 | 29.2 | 22 | 1.5 | 11.6 | 75.00% | 5.8 | 226 | 4.9 | 1109 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
2012 | 27 | MIN | 40 | 217 | 5.4 | 1 | 11 | 45.1 | 20 | 2.5 | 13.6 | 78.40% | 4.3 | 388 | 6 | 2314 | 13 | 4 | 19 |
2013 | 28 | MIN | 29 | 171 | 5.9 | 1 | 11 | 42.5 | 22 | 2.1 | 12.2 | 72.50% | 4.3 | 308 | 4.7 | 1437 | 11 | 5 | 11 |
2014 | 29 | MIN | 2 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 66.7 | 9 | 2 | 18 | 66.70% | 6 | 23 | 4 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
2015 | 30 | MIN | 30 | 222 | 7.4 | 0 | 9 | 41.7 | 49 | 1.9 | 13.9 | 83.30% | 6.2 | 357 | 4.8 | 1707 | 11 | 7 | 14 |
2016 | 31 | MIN | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2.7 | 50.00% | 1.3 | 40 | 2 | 80 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2017 | 32 | 2TM | 11 | 70 | 6.4 | 0 | 31.6 | 13 | 1.1 | 7 | 57.90% | 3.7 | 167 | 3.6 | 599 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
ARI | 9 | 66 | 7.3 | 0 | 3 | 37.5 | 13 | 1.5 | 11 | 56.30% | 4.1 | 138 | 3.7 | 514 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
NOR | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.5 | 1 | 66.70% | 1.3 | 29 | 2.9 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
2018 | 33 | WAS | 20 | 208 | 10.4 | 1 | 9 | 50 | 52 | 1.3 | 13 | 76.90% | 8 | 271 | 4.6 | 1250 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
2019 | 34 | WAS | 17 | 142 | 8.4 | 0 | 7 | 47.8 | 22 | 1.1 | 9.5 | 73.90% | 6.2 | 228 | 4.6 | 1040 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
2020 | 35 | DET | 12 | 101 | 8.4 | 0 | 4 | 55.6 | 23 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 66.70% | 5.6 | 168 | 4.2 | 705 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
2021 | 36 | 2TM | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 100.00% | 2 | 42 | 2.5 | 106 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
TEN | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 100.00% | 2 | 31 | 2.9 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
SEA | 0 | 11 | 1.5 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Career
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | Att | Yds | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | Y/G | A/G | Tgt |
Career | 184 | 167 | 3230 | 14918 | 120 | 717 | 44.8 | 90 | 4.6 | 81.1 | 17.6 | 424 | ||||
10 yrs | MIN | 123 | 116 | 2418 | 11747 | 97 | 568 | 45 | 82 | 4.9 | 95.5 | 19.7 | 334 | |||
2 yrs | WAS | 31 | 31 | 462 | 1940 | 12 | 88 | 45.9 | 90 | 4.2 | 62.6 | 14.9 | 49 | |||
1 yr | ARI | 6 | 6 | 129 | 448 | 2 | 16 | 38 | 27 | 3.5 | 74.7 | 21.5 | 16 | |||
1 yr | DET | 16 | 10 | 156 | 604 | 7 | 34 | 44.2 | 38 | 3.9 | 37.8 | 9.8 | 18 | |||
1 yr | NOR | 4 | 1 | 27 | 81 | 0 | 5 | 44.4 | 11 | 3 | 20.3 | 6.8 | 3 | |||
1 yr | SEA | 1 | 1 | 11 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 36.4 | 7 | 1.5 | 16 | 11 | ||||
1 yr | TEN | 3 | 2 | 27 | 82 | 1 | 4 | 44.4 | 16 | 3 | 27.3 | 9 | 4 |
More Career Stats:
Year | Age | Tm | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | R/G | Y/G | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | Touch | Y/Tch | YScm | RRTD | Fmb | AV |
Career | 305 | 2474 | 8.1 | 6 | 111 | 42.9 | 63 | 1.7 | 13.4 | 71.90% | 5.8 | 3535 | 4.9 | 17392 | 126 | 49 | 129 | ||
10 yrs | MIN | 241 | 1945 | 8.1 | 5 | 88 | 42.2 | 63 | 2 | 15.8 | 72.20% | 5.8 | 2659 | 5.1 | 13692 | 102 | 39 | 106 | |
2 yrs | WAS | 37 | 350 | 9.5 | 1 | 16 | 49 | 52 | 1.2 | 11.3 | 75.50% | 7.1 | 499 | 4.6 | 2290 | 13 | 6 | 13 | |
1 yr | ARI | 9 | 66 | 7.3 | 0 | 3 | 37.5 | 13 | 1.5 | 11 | 56.30% | 4.1 | 138 | 3.7 | 514 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
1 yr | DET | 12 | 101 | 8.4 | 0 | 4 | 55.6 | 23 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 66.70% | 5.6 | 168 | 4.2 | 705 | 7 | 5 | ||
1 yr | NOR | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.5 | 1 | 66.70% | 1.3 | 29 | 2.9 | 85 | 0 | 1 | ||
1 yr | SEA | 0 | 11 | 1.5 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||||
1 yr | TEN | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 100.00% | 2 | 31 | 2.9 | 90 | 1 | 1 |
Playoffs
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | G | GS | Att | Yds | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | Y/A | Y/G | A/G | Tgt | Rec |
2008 | 23 | MIN | HB | 1 | 1 | 20 | 83 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 40 | 4.2 | 83 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
2009 | 24 | MIN | HB,RB | 2 | 2 | 51 | 185 | 3 | 9 | 35.3 | 27 | 3.6 | 92.5 | 25.5 | 4 | 3 |
2012 | 27 | MIN | HB | 1 | 1 | 22 | 99 | 0 | 7 | 59.1 | 18 | 4.5 | 99 | 22 | 3 | 1 |
2015 | 30 | MIN | HB | 1 | 1 | 23 | 45 | 0 | 2 | 17.4 | 13 | 2 | 45 | 23 | 2 | 2 |
Career | 5 | 5 | 116 | 412 | 5 | 20 | 36.2 | 40 | 3.6 | 82.4 | 23.2 | 10 | 6 |
More Playoffs Stats:
Year | Age | Tm | Yds | Y/R | TD | 1D | Succ% | Lng | R/G | Y/G | Ctch% | Y/Tgt | Touch | Y/Tch | YScm | RRTD | Fmb |
2008 | 23 | MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 20 | 4.2 | 83 | 2 | 0 | |
2009 | 24 | MIN | 33 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 50 | 19 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 75.00% | 8.3 | 54 | 4 | 218 | 3 | 2 |
2012 | 27 | MIN | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 33.30% | 2.7 | 23 | 4.7 | 107 | 0 | 0 |
2015 | 30 | MIN | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 8 | 2 | 13 | 100.00% | 6.5 | 25 | 2.3 | 58 | 0 | 1 |
Career | 54 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 50 | 19 | 1.2 | 10.8 | 60.00% | 5.4 | 122 | 3.8 | 466 | 5 | 3 |
At YouWager.lv you can place a bet on the NFL with the best odds and promotions. Wager on the moneyline, spread, and total; on your favorite team or an undervalued underdog. Sign up with YouWager.lv now and get in the game with the best welcome bonus, click below: