Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, College Basketball Predictions, November 13, 2026
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, College Basketball Predictions, November 13, 2026
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: records, recent results, team stats and our winner pick.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: quick answers
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Who is the pick? | George Washington Revolutionaries to win |
| Game date | November 13, 2026 |
| Tipoff | Nov 13, 7:00 PM ET / Nov 13, 5:00 PM MT |
| Venue | Charles E. Smith Center |
| Game setting | George Washington Revolutionaries at home |
| Type of prediction | Outright winner only |
| Research checked | November 12, 2026 |
Our Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction favors George Washington Revolutionaries. The main reason is the stronger previous-season scoring balance. This is an early-season preview, so the distinction between last year’s production and this year’s personnel matters. The 2025–26 results below provide a baseline, while the 2026–27 roster information helps identify the people available to carry the plan into a new season.
The central question in Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction is whether George Washington Revolutionaries can create useful possessions without giving Harvard Crimson extra chances. A game can turn on the quality of its first shot, but it can also turn on the possessions that never produce a shot at all. Turnovers, offensive rebounds and unnecessary fouls are therefore part of the winner assessment, alongside the more familiar shooting numbers.
The market format is straightforward: select the team expected to win, with no required winning margin. Our college basketball betting guide explains the basic choices. You can find the matchup at YouWager; this preview does not claim that a specific price is available or attach the selection to an invented line.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: recent head-to-head history
No completed meeting between Harvard Crimson and George Washington Revolutionaries appears in the checked 2024–25 and 2025–26 national schedules. That means there is no score from that window to use as a direct recent comparison. It does not mean the programs have never met. For this early-season game, the better evidence is the current setting and the verified team information.
Our Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction gives current personnel more weight than a result produced by a different lineup. The familiar categories in basketball still provide the framework—shooting, possession, rebounding and foul management—but the people executing those tasks can change sharply from one November to the next. A historical win is useful context rather than a substitute for that comparison.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: trends to read correctly
Current season results
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: Harvard Crimson this season
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | Northeastern Huskies | Away | Loss | 70–74 |
| Nov 08, 2026 | Chicago Maroons | Away | Win | 63–47 |
| Nov 02, 2026 | MIT Engineers | Home | Win | 73–45 |
For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, Harvard Crimson went 2-1 in the completed games listed here. Read the opponents and venues before treating that small sample as a trend.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: George Washington Revolutionaries this season
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | Elon Phoenix | Home | Win | 69–50 |
| Nov 07, 2026 | Hampton Pirates | Home | Win | 75–61 |
| Nov 02, 2026 | Navy Midshipmen | Home | Win | 91–39 |
For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, George Washington Revolutionaries went 3-0 in the completed games listed here. Read the opponents and venues before treating that small sample as a trend.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: fixed betting odds
| Market | Selection | Line | American price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moneyline | Harvard Crimson | — | +625 |
| Moneyline | George Washington Revolutionaries | — | -950 |
| Spread | Harvard Crimson | 12.5 | +100 |
| Spread | George Washington Revolutionaries | -12.5 | -120 |
| Total | Over | 134.5 | -108 |
| Total | Under | 134.5 | -112 |
For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, the fixed figures are a comparison snapshot, not confirmed YouWager prices. N/A means a price or line wasn’t verified. The winner pick still stands on the matchup evidence below.
For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, the checked 2025–26 results for Harvard Crimson show 17-12 overall in 29 recorded games, 8-4 in the listed home games and 9-6 in the listed away games. There were 11 games decided by five points or fewer, with 6 wins in that group. These are straight-up results from the stated coverage, not an against-the-spread record. They describe the past schedule rather than a current 2026–27 winning streak.
For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, the checked 2025–26 results for George Washington Revolutionaries show 19-16 overall in 35 recorded games, 12-4 in the listed home games and 4-8 in the listed away games. There were 11 games decided by five points or fewer, with 4 wins in that group. These are straight-up results from the stated coverage, not an against-the-spread record. They describe the past schedule rather than a current 2026–27 winning streak.
Those trends need context because a short sequence is sensitive to the opponents and venues in it. The statistical idea of sample variability is useful here. A hot shooting night against one opponent should not automatically become an expectation against another. Our handicapping guide provides a broader way to organize the evidence without confusing a descriptive trend with a guarantee.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: the statistical baseline
| Previous-season measure | Harvard Crimson | George Washington Revolutionaries |
|---|---|---|
| Checked 2025–26 games | 29 | 35 |
| Record in those games | 17-12 | 19-16 |
| Points per game in those results | 70.1 | 81.4 |
| Points allowed per game in those results | 66.7 | 74.2 |
| Regular-season stat-feed games | 29.0 | 33.0 |
| Field-goal percentage | 46.3 | 46.7 |
| Three-point percentage | 34.6 | 35.2 |
| Free-throw percentage | 79.9 | 71.8 |
| Rebounds per game | 32.3 | 37.7 |
| Offensive rebounds per game | 8.3 | 12.8 |
| Assists per game | 14.1 | 15.7 |
| Turnovers per game | 11.1 | 12.7 |
| Steals per game | 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Blocks per game | 3.6 | 3.5 |
The table supports Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction by keeping the results record separate from the statistical feed. The results can include postseason games; the shooting and possession figures are from the 2025–26 regular-season feed. Where the national feed contains only a small subset for a smaller program, it is not presented as a complete season split. None of these numbers is described as a new-season average. The current game listing can be checked through the matchup schedule.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: Harvard Crimson last 10 games
| Date | Site | Opponent | W/L | Team score–opponent score | Season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | Away | Northeastern Huskies | L | 70-74 | 2026–27 |
| Nov 08, 2026 | Away | Chicago Maroons | W | 63-47 | 2026–27 |
| Nov 02, 2026 | Home | MIT Engineers | W | 73-45 | 2026–27 |
| Mar 14, 2026 | Neutral | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 60-62 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 06, 2026 | Home | Columbia Lions | W | 81-71 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 28, 2026 | Away | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 61-64 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Away | Princeton Tigers | W | 58-56 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 21, 2026 | Away | Cornell Big Red | W | 73-54 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 14, 2026 | Home | Yale Bulldogs | L | 75-76 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Home | Brown Bears | W | 56-53 | 2025–26 |
The results window for Harvard Crimson contains 10 verified games, with a 6-4 record, 67.0 points scored and 60.2 allowed per game. For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, these are historical completed results, not ten games already played in the new season. The season column identifies the relevant campaign. A strong finish can provide useful background, while the new roster still has to establish its own form.
The newest listed result was a loss against Northeastern Huskies on Nov 10, 2026: 70-74 from the perspective of Harvard Crimson. In the latest 5 games of this window, the record is 3-2, with scoring averages of 69.4 for and 59.8 against. The strongest margin in the displayed set was 73-45 against MIT Engineers; the toughest was 70-74 against Northeastern Huskies.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: George Washington Revolutionaries last 10 games
| Date | Site | Opponent | W/L | Team score–opponent score | Season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2026 | Home | Elon Phoenix | W | 69-50 | 2026–27 |
| Nov 07, 2026 | Home | Hampton Pirates | W | 75-61 | 2026–27 |
| Nov 02, 2026 | Home | Navy Midshipmen | W | 91-39 | 2026–27 |
| Mar 22, 2026 | Away | New Mexico Lobos | L | 61-86 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Away | Utah Valley Wolverines | W | 79-78 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Neutral | Saint Louis Billikens | L | 81-88 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Neutral | Fordham Rams | W | 66-62 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 07, 2026 | Away | Loyola Chicago Ramblers | L | 62-68 | 2025–26 |
| Mar 04, 2026 | Home | St. Bonaventure Bonnies | W | 91-82 | 2025–26 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Home | Dayton Flyers | L | 66-68 | 2025–26 |
The results window for George Washington Revolutionaries contains 10 verified games, with a 6-4 record, 74.1 points scored and 68.2 allowed per game. For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, these are historical completed results, not ten games already played in the new season. The season column identifies the relevant campaign. A strong finish can provide useful background, while the new roster still has to establish its own form.
The newest listed result was a win against Elon Phoenix on Nov 10, 2026: 69-50 from the perspective of George Washington Revolutionaries. In the latest 5 games of this window, the record is 4-1, with scoring averages of 75.0 for and 62.8 against. The strongest margin in the displayed set was 91-39 against Navy Midshipmen; the toughest was 61-86 against New Mexico Lobos.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: offense, defense and possessions
The first matchup question in Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction is how Harvard Crimson and George Washington Revolutionaries handle the ball before the defense is set. A controlled early attack can produce a good shot, but a rushed attack can produce a turnover and an easier chance in the other direction. The team that gets into its offense cleanly will have more opportunities to make the opposing defense solve the intended action rather than benefit from a mistake.
The second question in Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction is who finishes possessions on the glass. One defensive stop does not help if the offense immediately gets a second attempt. For George Washington Revolutionaries, winning the initial matchup and securing the rebound would support the preferred script. For Harvard Crimson, extra attempts are a direct route to making the game closer without requiring a perfect first-shot percentage.
The direct shooting comparison puts Harvard Crimson at 53.2% effective field-goal shooting and George Washington Revolutionaries at 54.9%. The difference is 1.6 percentage points, favoring George Washington Revolutionaries. Meanwhile, the previous turnover averages were 11.1 for Harvard Crimson and 12.7 for George Washington Revolutionaries. That makes ball security a useful part of the case for Harvard Crimson, although opponents and tempo differed across the two schedules.
Harvard Crimson: what the baseline says
The checked 2025–26 results for Harvard Crimson cover 29 completed games and a 17-12 record. In that set, the scoring averages are 70.1 points for and 66.7 points against. Postseason games are included in the results record where they were played. For this early-season game against George Washington Revolutionaries, those figures describe the previous team. They do not mean that the current roster has already produced the same level of offense or defense.
The shooting baseline for Harvard Crimson was 46.3% from the field and 34.6% from three in the 2025–26 regular-season statistical feed. That outside percentage makes shot selection important; volume alone would not establish a reliable scoring plan. Against George Washington Revolutionaries, the useful distinction is between an open catch-and-shoot chance and a contested attempt taken because the possession is running out of time. A team can shoot the same number of threes while creating a very different quality of offense.
The calculated effective field-goal percentage for Harvard Crimson is 53.2%, and 40.1% of field-goal attempts came from three-point range. Effective field-goal percentage gives extra credit to a made three. That shot mix suggests a useful test against George Washington Revolutionaries: whether perimeter coverage can force a less comfortable attempt without leaving the lane open.
At the foul line, Harvard Crimson averaged 14.6 attempts per game and converted 79.9%. Getting to the line can support scoring even when jump shots are uneven, but the route matters. Strong drives and good post position create different pressure from a player leaning into difficult contact. George Washington Revolutionaries needs to defend without repeatedly sending a capable shooter to the stripe. If the game stays close, the same free-throw skill also becomes important when the leading team is intentionally fouled.
The ball-movement profile shows 14.1 assists and 11.1 turnovers per game for Harvard Crimson, with an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.3. Those are team figures, so they do not identify one guard as responsible for every decision. They do identify a useful question against George Washington Revolutionaries: can the new ball handlers create a good shot without exposing the ball to pressure? The answer will help determine whether the offense can keep its spacing and use its preferred actions.
Rebounding gives Harvard Crimson another way to influence possessions. The previous regular-season feed lists 32.3 total rebounds per game, including 8.3 on offense and 24.0 on defense. Raw rebound totals are affected by pace and missed shots, so they are not the same as rebound percentages. Still, George Washington Revolutionaries needs to finish each defensive stand with the ball. An opponent that allows repeated second chances can defend the first action well and still lose the possession.
For defensive disruption, Harvard Crimson recorded 7.2 steals and 3.6 blocks per game. These numbers are useful clues about past events rather than a complete rating of the current defense. A team can block a shot and still surrender an offensive rebound; it can also defend a possession successfully without recording either a steal or a block. Against George Washington Revolutionaries, the more valuable outcome is a controlled stop that allows the offense to begin without a scramble.
George Washington Revolutionaries: what the baseline says
The checked 2025–26 results for George Washington Revolutionaries cover 35 completed games and a 19-16 record. In that set, the scoring averages are 81.4 points for and 74.2 points against. Postseason games are included in the results record where they were played. For this early-season game against Harvard Crimson, those figures describe the previous team. They do not mean that the current roster has already produced the same level of offense or defense.
The shooting baseline for George Washington Revolutionaries was 46.7% from the field and 35.2% from three in the 2025–26 regular-season statistical feed. The three-point percentage supports respecting the outside shot, while the new rotation still has to reproduce it. Against Harvard Crimson, the useful distinction is between an open catch-and-shoot chance and a contested attempt taken because the possession is running out of time. A team can shoot the same number of threes while creating a very different quality of offense.
The calculated effective field-goal percentage for George Washington Revolutionaries is 54.9%, and 46.6% of field-goal attempts came from three-point range. Effective field-goal percentage gives extra credit to a made three. That shot mix suggests a useful test against Harvard Crimson: whether perimeter coverage can force a less comfortable attempt without leaving the lane open.
At the foul line, George Washington Revolutionaries averaged 21.3 attempts per game and converted 71.8%. Getting to the line can support scoring even when jump shots are uneven, but the route matters. Strong drives and good post position create different pressure from a player leaning into difficult contact. Harvard Crimson needs to defend without repeatedly sending a capable shooter to the stripe. If the game stays close, the same free-throw skill also becomes important when the leading team is intentionally fouled.
The ball-movement profile shows 15.7 assists and 12.7 turnovers per game for George Washington Revolutionaries, with an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.2. Those are team figures, so they do not identify one guard as responsible for every decision. They do identify a useful question against Harvard Crimson: can the new ball handlers create a good shot without exposing the ball to pressure? The answer will help determine whether the offense can keep its spacing and use its preferred actions.
Rebounding gives George Washington Revolutionaries another way to influence possessions. The previous regular-season feed lists 37.7 total rebounds per game, including 12.8 on offense and 25.0 on defense. Raw rebound totals are affected by pace and missed shots, so they are not the same as rebound percentages. Still, Harvard Crimson needs to finish each defensive stand with the ball. An opponent that allows repeated second chances can defend the first action well and still lose the possession.
For defensive disruption, George Washington Revolutionaries recorded 7.5 steals and 3.5 blocks per game. These numbers are useful clues about past events rather than a complete rating of the current defense. A team can block a shot and still surrender an offensive rebound; it can also defend a possession successfully without recording either a steal or a block. Against Harvard Crimson, the more valuable outcome is a controlled stop that allows the offense to begin without a scramble.
2026–27 personnel and roster context
Harvard Crimson: current roster reference
| 2026–27 roster reference | Position | Height | Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luca Ace-Nasteski | F | 6′ 10″ | Senior |
| Julian Adigun | C | 7′ 0″ | Freshman |
| Tey Barbour | G | 6′ 4″ | Junior |
| Thomas Batties II | F | 6′ 7″ | Senior |
| Brandon Burrell | G | 6′ 1″ | Freshman |
| Dutch Dowdell | G | 6′ 6″ | Junior |
| Avner Dror | F | 6′ 9″ | Sophomore |
| Ben Eisendrath | G | 6′ 2″ | Junior |
| Robert Hinton | G | 6′ 5″ | Junior |
| Austin Hunt | G | 6′ 4″ | Junior |
| Frankie Mannino | G | 6′ 5″ | Sophomore |
| Preston Merrick | G | 6′ 5″ | Freshman |
| Kabir Narasimhan | F | 6′ 5″ | Freshman |
| Xavier Nesbitt | G | 5′ 11″ | Senior |
| Kenan Parrish | F | 7′ 0″ | Sophomore |
| Payton Pitts | G | 6′ 2″ | Senior |
The current roster feed lists Tommy Amaker as head coach for Harvard Crimson. The table gives the listed players, positions, heights and classes. It is a roster reference, not a projected starting five or a statement that every player has been medically cleared for this game. A name on the roster also does not establish a particular minute load.
George Washington Revolutionaries: current roster reference
| 2026–27 roster reference | Position | Height | Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jean Aranguren | G | 6′ 3″ | Senior |
| Terrance Arceneaux | G | 6′ 6″ | Senior |
| Amir Arrington | G | 6′ 0″ | Senior |
| Malachi Arrington | F | 6′ 9″ | Junior |
| Ryder Frost | F | 6′ 7″ | Sophomore |
| Dylan James | F | 6′ 9″ | Senior |
| Felix Kossaras | G | 6′ 6″ | Junior |
| Deng Manyang | F | 6′ 7″ | Freshman |
| Promis N’Landu | G | 6′ 2″ | Freshman |
| Andrew Phillips | G | 6′ 5″ | Senior |
| Jayvon Rampersant | F | 6′ 8″ | Freshman |
| Jalen Rougier-Roane | G | 6′ 4″ | Sophomore |
| Aidan Shaw | F | 6′ 9″ | Senior |
| Lovro Urbiha | F | 6′ 8″ | Senior |
| Andrija Vukovic | F | 6′ 11″ | Junior |
| Omari Witherspoon | G | 6′ 6″ | Sophomore |
The current roster feed lists Chris Caputo as head coach for George Washington Revolutionaries. The table gives the listed players, positions, heights and classes. It is a roster reference, not a projected starting five or a statement that every player has been medically cleared for this game. A name on the roster also does not establish a particular minute load.
The roster information gives Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction a necessary new-season check. Last year’s team shooting percentage can change when a high-volume player leaves, a new guard takes over the ball or a frontcourt pairing changes. Experience labels help describe the group, but a senior transfer can still be new to the system. The important question is which combinations can defend, rebound and create a sound shot together against this specific opponent.
Game setting and the likely paths to a win
The setting for Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction is Charles E. Smith Center. George Washington Revolutionaries has the familiar home environment, while Harvard Crimson must handle the road setting and its communication demands. The listed tipoff is Nov 13, 7:00 PM ET / Nov 13, 5:00 PM MT. A late change to the official schedule should be checked before planning around the broadcast or placing a wager.
The preferred script in Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction has George Washington Revolutionaries generating repeated useful possessions instead of needing an unusual run of steals or contested three-pointers. A lead would allow that team to keep using its normal offense rather than forcing a response. Harvard Crimson wants the game to remain close enough for a few extra rebounds, a strong shooting stretch or a productive late possession to change the outcome.
The main risk to Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction is that this game reveals a different level of organization from the one suggested by the previous-season baseline. Harvard Crimson can challenge the pick by protecting the ball, making the selected side defend for longer and avoiding unnecessary fouls. If George Washington Revolutionaries starts trading empty possessions for easy opposing points, the game would be moving away from the clean, repeatable execution behind this selection.
That is why the winner opinion is kept separate from a specific betting price. Our moneyline betting guide explains the format. At YouWager, the final game status and any confirmed availability changes should be checked before deciding whether to place a wager. Nothing in this preview turns the pick into a guaranteed score or a reason to chase an earlier loss.
Common questions about this matchup
Are these new-season statistics?
No. The historical results and statistical baselines are labeled 2025–26. The roster reference is labeled 2026–27 where that roster is available. For Harvard Crimson and George Washington Revolutionaries, the new season still has to establish how those players work together. Exhibition results are not silently blended into a regular-season record.
Does the pick require a certain winning margin?
No. Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction selects George Washington Revolutionaries to win the game outright. It does not require a point-spread cover and does not attach the pick to an unverified total. The betting school guides explain how those markets differ. A team can be the preferred winner while its current price is still a separate decision.
What should be checked again before tipoff?
Confirmed availability changes and the final game listing matter most. A different primary ball handler or an unavailable interior defender could change the matchup more than a small difference in last year’s average. The handicapping guide adds background on evaluating the market, while this preview keeps the focus on the two teams and the winner.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: three things to watch
Start with shot quality in Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction. George Washington Revolutionaries is our pick, but look for whether its first clean looks come at the rim, from kick-outs, or at the line. A few difficult makes can build a lead without proving the offense has found a dependable shot.
Next, count the possessions that end without a shot. In Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, Harvard Crimson can narrow the gap if it forces bad passes and turns those mistakes into quick points. A dead-ball turnover and an interception that leads straight to a layup cost the same possession but can have very different effects.
Finally, look at who comes away with the ball after the first miss. For Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction, a strong rebounding stretch can keep a team in the game even if it starts cold. Watch whether help defenders get back to their box-outs after a drive.
Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries Betting Prediction: final pick
The selection is George Washington Revolutionaries after weighing the available scoring history, the roster context and the setting. The case for Harvard Crimson depends on turning enough possessions in its favor to interrupt that route. The pick stays with the team expected to execute more consistently over the full game; it does not require predicting the exact final score.
The matchup can be followed at YouWager as game day approaches. Research was checked November 12, ahead of the November 13 slate, with earlier-season results clearly identified rather than presented as current form.
Our prediction: George Washington Revolutionaries to win.