Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends, Odds, Prediction | NCAAB
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends, Odds, Prediction | NCAAB. Place a college basketball bet on this game at YouWager.lv.
For more info read our pages about Tennessee Betting and Virginia Betting.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Odds
Here are the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Odds:
TEAM | SPREAD | MONEYLINE | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
Chattanooga Mocs | +4.5 | +167 | 146 U |
UC Irvine Anteaters | -4.5 | -195 | 146 O |
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends
Here are the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends for both teams, but first, the head-to-head stats:
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Head-to-Head
No matchups available.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Mocs
Now, we have the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends for the Mocs:
- In their last eight games, Chattanooga has a 7-1 ATS record.
- Four of Chattanooga’s previous five games have seen the total go OVER.
- In their last 17 games, Chattanooga has a 16-1 SU record.
- Four of Chattanooga’s last five Thursday games have seen the total fall UNDER.
- In their previous nine away Thursday games, Chattanooga has a 7-2 SU record.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Anteaters
Now, we have the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends for the Anteaters:
- In their last eight games, UC Irvine has a 6-2 ATS record.
- In their last 11 games, UC Irvine has a 10-1 record against SU.
- In their last 20 Thursday games, UC Irvine is 18-2 overall.
- Nine of UC Irvine’s previous ten home games on Thursdays have seen the total go OVER.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Against the Spread
Now, in these Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends, we have the against the spread info:
- So far this season, UC Irvine’s ATS record is 21-12-0.
- In 30 games with a spread this season, Chattanooga has covered 19 times.
- The Anteaters’ 75.7 points per game are just 3.1 greater than the Mocs’ 72.6 points.
- UC Irvine is 18-1 overall and 14-4 against the spread when it scores more than 72.6 points.
- Chattanooga is 15-3 against the spread and 17-3 overall when it gives up fewer than 75.7 points.
- The Mocs score 79.6 points per game, which is 13.1 higher than the Anteaters’ 66.5 points.
- When Chattanooga scores more than 66.5 points, it is 23-4 overall and 17-8 against the spread.
- When its opponents score less than 79.6 points, UC Irvine has an overall record of 23-2 and an ATS record of 17-7.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction
Now we have the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction for both teams.
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 9 p.m. ET, the UC Irvine Anteaters (32-6) take on the Chattanooga Mocs (28-9) in a matchup between two hot teams. The Mocs, who have won four in a row, will test the Anteaters’ ability to extend their winning streak. We break down the Chattanooga vs. UC Irvine odds and lines in our preview.
There is currently no line-up for the Anteaters vs. Mocs meeting.
This season, Chattanooga has a 19-11-0 record against the spread, while UC Irvine has a 21-12-0 record. In terms of hitting the over, the Mocs are 16-14-0 and the Anteaters are 14-19-0. In their last ten games, UC Irvine is 6-4 against the spread and 8-2 overall, while Chattanooga is 8-2 against the spread and 10-0 overall.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction: Mocs
Here is the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction for the Mocs:
In their most recent match, the Chattanooga Mocs met Loyola on the court and won 80-73. In terms of fouls, Loyola finished with 13 while the Mocs finished with 15. Out of their 27 3-point attempts, they made nine of them. Loyola made 14 of their 17 free throw attempts, finishing with an 82.4% shooting percentage. At the end of the game, Loyola had no rejections despite having 22 rebounds (5 offensive, 17 defensive). In this game, Loyola recorded three steals and eighteen assists.
Regarding defense, Chattanooga allowed their opponent to shoot 25 of 50 from the field, or 50.0%. In this game, they also committed 11 turnovers, pulled off five steals, and disheveled 22 dimes. They pulled down a total of 26 rebounds, nine of which were offensive in nature. The Mocs sunk seven out of ten attempts at the charity stripe, for a 70.0% percentage. Chattanooga made nine of their twenty-one three-point attempts and finished the game with a 52.5% field goal percentage (32 of 61).
One man who performed well in this battle is Trey Bonham. He finished the game with two assists and a 62.5% shooting percentage. In addition to playing 36 minutes, he pulled down three rebounds. On 10 of 16 shots, he finished with 23 points.
With a campaign score of 27-9, Chattanooga takes the hardwood. They go 48.1% from the field and average 79.6 points per game, enough for 44th place in Division 1. The Mocs are shooting 77.0% from the charity stripe and 36.2% from 3-point range (349 of 964). In terms of passing, Chattanooga is eighth in Division 1 with 611 assists this season and 33.2 rebounds per game as a team. They commit 15.9 fouls per game as a team and turn the ball over 10.1 times a game.
The Mocs are drawing 16.2 fouls and forcing 11.2 turnovers per game on the defensive end of the court. They now have 448 assists given up this season, which puts them 223rd in the country in terms of allowing assists to the opposition. As a team, the Mocs are forfeiting 33.3 boards per game and a FG percentage of 43.7% (918 of 2,100). They are 203rd in college basketball in terms of points per game (72.6) and are giving up 34.7% from beyond the arc.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Mocs Stats & Insights
With a +257 overall scoring differential, Chattanooga is outscoring opponents by seven points per game. It scores 79.6 points per game, ranking 44th in NCAA basketball, and surrenders 72.6 points per game, ranking 199th.
The Mocs score 79.6 points per game, 13.1 more than the Anteaters (66.5).
Chattanooga shoots 36.3% from beyond the arc (54th in college basketball) and hits 9.7 three-pointers a game (33rd in college basketball). Compared to its opponents, who drain 8.3 threes a game at 34.6%, it is making 1.4 more threes.
At home, the Mocs average 81.8 points per game, while away, they score 77.7.
In its previous ten games, Chattanooga has averaged 82.9 points per game, 3.3 more than its season average of 79.6 points.
Mocs Key Players to Watch
Name | GP | PTS | REB | ASST | STL | BLK | 3PM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honor Huff | 37 | 15.4 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 3.5 |
Trey Bonham | 37 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.7 |
Bash Wieland | 35 | 13.9 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
Frank Champion | 23 | 11.4 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
Garrison Keeslar | 37 | 6.3 | 4.6 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
- Trey Bonham is averaging 14.3 points, 4.5 rebounds, and 2.8 assists per game. He also makes 1.7 triples per game and makes 45.5% of his shots from the field and 34.4% from beyond the arc.
- Honor Huff is leading the club in assists (2.3) and points (15.4 per game). In addition, he is pulling down 1.9 rebounds, shooting 43.4% from the field and 42.5% from three-point range, and grabbing 3.5 treys a game, which is second in the country.
- Each game, Bash Wieland contributes 13.9 points, 4.1 rebounds, and 1.6 assists to the Mocs. In addition, he averages 0.1 blocked shots and 0.9 steals.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Mocs Last 10 Games
Date | Opponent | Score | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4/01/25
|
L-IL
|
W 80-73
|
W+2.5
|
O149.5
|
W+116
|
3/25/25
|
@BRAD
|
W 67-65
|
W+5.5
|
U150.5
|
W+180
|
3/22/25
|
DAY
|
W 87-72
|
W+3.5
|
O150.5
|
W+140
|
3/18/25
|
@MTU
|
W 109-103
|
W+3.5
|
O147.5
|
W+146
|
3/01/25
|
@VMI
|
W 91-70
|
W-9.5
|
O153.5
|
W-395
|
2/27/25
|
@UNCG
|
W 75-63
|
W+1.5
|
U142.5
|
WEVEN
|
2/22/25
|
CIT
|
W 76-75
|
L-19.5
|
O145
|
W-6600
|
2/19/25
|
WCU
|
W 91-86
|
L-16.5
|
O152.5
|
W-2100
|
2/15/25
|
ETSU
|
W 78-71
|
W-3.5
|
O146.5
|
W-170
|
2/12/25
|
@SAM
|
W 82-68
|
W+5.5
|
U156
|
W+200
|
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction: Anteaters
Here is the Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Prediction for the Anteaters:
The UC Irvine Anteaters defeated North Texas 69-67 in their most recent game. UC Irvine allowed North Texas to pull down 31 overall (13 on the offensive glass) in relation to their glass attack. They made 12 of 16 free throws (75.0%) and concluded the game with a 38.9% 3-point shooting percentage (7 of 18). North Texas had a shooting percentage of 34.3% in this game as the Anteaters allowed them to convert 24 of 70 tries from the field.
The Anteaters shot 24 for 49 from the field at the final whistle, giving them a 49.0% percentage. In terms of shooting from downtown, UC Irvine made nine out of eighteen (50.0%) tries. They had a 70.6% success rate, burying 12 of their free throw tries. Throughout the game, North Texas committed 17 personal fouls, sending the Anteaters to the charity stripe for a total of 17 tries. They received four thefts during the game and coughed it up seventeen times. The Anteaters finished the game with 32 rebounds, 24 on defense and 8 on offense.
Devin Tillis ultimately made a difference for the Anteaters in the game. During his 35 minutes on the court, he scored 16 points and dished out one assist. He pulled down 11 rebounds and made 6 of 11 field goals in this game, good for a 54.5% field goal percentage.
The campaign record for UC Irvine is 31-6. In Division 1, the Anteaters are 144th in offensive execution, shooting 45.3% from the field. This season, UC Irvine has scored 2,809 points (75.9 points per game) and pulled down 38.2 rebounds per game. They are giving up possession 12.6 times per game and helping teammates 15.7 times per game, which ranks them 53rd in the country. The Anteaters go 80.3% from the free throw line and commit 15.5 personal fouls per game.
The opponents are making 72.1% of their free throw attempts, and the UC Irvine defense gives up 33.7% of 3-pointers (286 of 848). They rank 209th and 188th in key defensive statistics, giving up 13.5 dimes and 34.4 boards per game, respectively. With a defensive rating of 66.5 points per game, the Anteaters are 38th in the nation. They let teams shoot 39.6% from the field (12th in college) and force 12.8 turnovers a game.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Anteaters Stats & Insights
UC Irvine has a +350 overall scoring differential and outscores opponents by 9.2 points per game (75.7 points per game to rank 127th in college basketball, while allowing up 66.5 points per game to rank 35th).
On average, the Anteaters are scoring 75.7 points, which is just 3.1 higher than the Mocs’ 72.6 average.
UC Irvine ranks 233rd in college basketball with an average of 7.2 three-pointers per game, while its opponents average 7.7.
This season, the Anteaters are scoring the same number of points (76.8) both at home and away.
Over the past ten games, UC Irvine’s offense has improved, scoring 78.6 points per game as opposed to the 75.7 it has averaged this season.
Anteaters Key Players to Watch
Name | GP | PTS | REB | ASST | STL | BLK | 3PM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bent Leuchten | 38 | 15.4 | 9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
Devin Tillis | 37 | 13.5 | 7.8 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
Myles Che | 37 | 12.1 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0 | 1.5 |
Justin Hohn | 37 | 12.1 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0 | 2 |
Jurian Dixon | 38 | 8.7 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
- Bent Leuchten leads the club in both scoring and rebounds, averaging 15.4 points and 9.0 per game. In addition, he is shooting 54.6% from the field and dishing up 1.6 assists on average.
- Devin Tillis shoots 53.4% from the field, 38.3% from beyond the arc, and makes 1.2 3-pointers a game, averaging 13.5 points, 7.8 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game.
- Justin Hohn leads the Anteaters with 3.8 assists per game, 12.1 points, and 3.1 rebounds.
Chattanooga Mocs vs UC Irvine Anteaters Betting Trends: Anteaters Last 10 Games
Date | Opponent | Score | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4/01/25
|
UNT
|
W 69-67
|
W+1.5
|
O130.5
|
W-105
|
3/26/25
|
UAB
|
W 81-77
|
L-5.5
|
U158.5
|
W-205
|
3/23/25
|
JVST
|
W 66-61
|
L-7.0
|
U138
|
W-315
|
3/19/25
|
UNCO
|
W 82-72
|
W-7.5
|
O147.5
|
W-315
|
3/08/25
|
@UCSB
|
W 97-88
|
W-4.5
|
O140.5
|
W-178
|
3/06/25
|
@UCD
|
W 88-59
|
W-7.5
|
O132.5
|
W-330
|
3/01/25
|
LBSU
|
W 70-60
|
L-16.5
|
U135.5
|
W-3000
|
2/27/25
|
@CSF
|
W 76-51
|
W-17.5
|
U139.5
|
W-3000
|
2/22/25
|
@CSB
|
W 73-64
|
W-8.0
|
U140
|
W-425
|
2/20/25
|
CSN
|
L 84-72
|
L-6.5
|
O149
|
L-270
|
Read our page on how to bet on college basketball. Visit the Betting School and learn how to wager on the moneyline, spread, and total; on your favorite team or an undervalued underdog. Sign up with YouWager.lv now and get in the game with the best welcome bonus, click below: