Can Team Ranking Models Predict Soccer Better Than Experts?

Sports analysts often rely on rankings, expert opinions, and statistical models to predict how a soccer season will unfold. But which approach performs best over the long run?

According to sports data analyst Simon Gleave, who has studied preseason predictions for years, forecasting league standings involves “a great deal of luck as well as skill.” Even the best experts struggle to consistently outperform simple statistical benchmarks.

The Euro Club Index Explained

One of the best-known rating systems in European soccer is the Euro Club Index, developed to measure the relative strength of clubs across Europe’s top leagues.

Instead of relying on opinions, the system assigns every club a numerical rating based on competitive match results.

At the beginning of the 2015/16 season, some of the highest-rated clubs included:

Club | Rating
Barcelona | 4,539
Real Madrid | 4,342
Bayern Munich | 3,953
Juventus | 3,712
Chelsea | 3,635

Further down the rankings were clubs such as:

Club | Rating
Bournemouth | 2,052
Celtic | 2,480
Kilmarnock | 1,093

The ratings constantly change throughout the season as teams play competitive matches.

How the Rating System Works

Whenever two teams meet, rating points move from the losing club to the winner.

The number of points exchanged depends on the relative strength of the teams:

Defeating a highly rated opponent earns a large rating increase.

Beating a much weaker club results in only a small gain.

Losing to a significantly weaker opponent causes a substantial drop.

For example, when Juventus defeated Real Madrid in the 2015 UEFA Champions League semifinal, Juventus gained considerably more rating points than it later lost after being defeated by Barcelona in the final.

Likewise, if a lower-ranked club were to upset one of Europe’s elite teams in a competitive match, the underdog would receive a significant boost in its rating.

Are Statistical Models Better Than Human Experts?

During the 2014/15 Premier League season, the Euro Club Index performed extremely well. Its preseason forecast matched the accuracy of the best-performing soccer journalist that year, with an average prediction error of fewer than two league positions.

However, success in one season does not guarantee long-term superiority.

When analysts examined the much more unpredictable 2013/14 season, the model struggled considerably. Rapid changes in team performance, unexpected managerial changes, surprise title challenges, and relegation battles reduced the accuracy of rankings based heavily on previous results.

In fact, several human analysts outperformed the statistical model that season.

Why Long-Term Prediction Is So Difficult

Soccer is influenced by countless variables that no ranking system can fully anticipate, including:

Major injuries

Player transfers

Tactical changes

Managerial appointments

Fixture congestion

Unexpected player development

Team chemistry

Because of these factors, even sophisticated statistical models have difficulty consistently forecasting an entire season.

What Bettors Should Take Away

Whether you rely on expert opinion, advanced ranking systems, or public consensus, none has demonstrated the ability to consistently predict full-season outcomes better than simple historical expectations.

Statistical models provide valuable insight into team strength, while experienced analysts can add important context. However, soccer remains unpredictable, and no forecasting method consistently delivers perfect results over multiple seasons.

For bettors, rankings and expert predictions should be treated as useful tools—not guarantees. The most successful betting strategies combine statistical analysis with current information rather than depending solely on preseason forecasts.